Reference evapotranspiration retrievals from a mesoscale model based weather variables for soil moisture deficit estimation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Srivastava, P.K.
dc.contributor.author Han, Dawei
dc.contributor.author Yaduvanshi, Aradhana
dc.contributor.author Petropoulos, George P.
dc.contributor.author Singh, Sudhir Kumar
dc.contributor.author Mall, Rajesh Kumar
dc.contributor.author Prasad, Rajendra
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-12T05:46:17Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-12T05:46:17Z
dc.date.issued 2017-10-28
dc.identifier.issn 20711050
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/611
dc.description.abstract Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) and soil moisture deficit (SMD) are vital for understanding the hydrological processes, particularly in the context of sustainable water use efficiency in the globe. Precise estimation of ETo and SMD are required for developing appropriate forecasting systems, in hydrological modeling and also in precision agriculture. In this study, the surface temperature downscaled from Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is used to estimate ETo using the boundary conditions that are provided by the European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF). In order to understand the performance, the Hamon's method is employed to estimate the ETo using the temperature from meteorological station and WRF derived variables. After estimating the ETo, a range of linear and non-linear models is utilized to retrieve SMD. The performance statistics such as RMSE, %Bias, and Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) indicates that the exponential model (RMSE = 0.226; %Bias = -0.077; NSE = 0.616) is efficient for SMD estimation by using the Observed ETo in comparison to the other linear and non-linear models (RMSE range = 0.019-0.667; %Bias range = 2.821-6.894; NSE = 0.013-0.419) used in this study. On the other hand, in the scenario where SMD is estimated using WRF downscaled meteorological variables based ETo, the linear model is found promising (RMSE = 0.017; %Bias = 5.280; NSE = 0.448) as compared to the non-linear models (RMSE range = 0.022-0.707; %Bias range = -0.207--6.088; NSE range = 0.013-0.149). Our findings also suggest that all the models are performing better during the growing season (RMSE range = 0.024-0.025; %Bias range = -4.982--3.431; r = 0.245-0.281) than the non-growing season (RMSE range = 0.011-0.12; %Bias range = 33.073-32.701; r = 0.161-0.244) for SMD estimation. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Government of the United Kingdom Ministry of Human Resource Development en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher MDPI AG en_US
dc.subject Evapotranspiration en_US
dc.subject Noah Land Surface model en_US
dc.subject Seasonality en_US
dc.subject Soil moisture deficit en_US
dc.subject WRF en_US
dc.title Reference evapotranspiration retrievals from a mesoscale model based weather variables for soil moisture deficit estimation en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search in IDR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account